<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Forbes Sees Potential for Yvonne Strahovski, Plus More Polls</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chucktv.net/2009/06/21/forbes-sees-potential-for-yvonne-strahovski-plus-more-polls/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chucktv.net/2009/06/21/forbes-sees-potential-for-yvonne-strahovski-plus-more-polls/</link>
	<description>Your source for news about NBC&#039;s new series, Chuck.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 14:53:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: annochino</title>
		<link>http://chucktv.net/2009/06/21/forbes-sees-potential-for-yvonne-strahovski-plus-more-polls/comment-page-1/#comment-3706</link>
		<dc:creator>annochino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 16:05:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chucktv.net/?p=1881#comment-3706</guid>
		<description>hi. am ac from the philippines. i like watchin chuck... good actors... esp Yvonne Strahovski. i see the potential in her she reminds me of great actors like Meryl Streep, Nicole Kidman, Demi Moore, Cate Blanchett among others. why? because the screen practically loves them. they breathe &amp; give life to characters as if they were real persons, and it brings audiences to get really involved in their fictitous characters because it appeals to real emotions and feelings of real people like u and me. 

i believe good actors, like the ones mentioned, and i have particularly noticed with Yvonne Strahovski, although lesser famous than the ones mentioned, not only show a dozen expressions, emotions, feelings of the characters that project authentication, but most importantly, done with the most minimal of physical movement on screen. i know for a fact acting school addresses this, and trains aspiring actors to do just that, but only a handful have mastered the art of less movement with authentic projection of feelings, emotions, and expressions without looking overacting or too subtle.

i see the potential of Yvonne Strahovski, and if she or her people do check on fan mail such as this, she should seriously be careful in doing projects that showcase what she does best acting... she has a potential for a character actress based on her acting as i&#039;ve seen. and it&#039;s no exaggeration. i&#039;ve watched possibly more than a hundred films of good actors and am very picky. versatility of choosing good roles and good directors are also good for her. i hope she will choose her roles carefully and discern well. to make careful, but planned good decisions to reach a particular goal: to win an Oscar for best female actor.

she is not just another beautiful face as it seems, but has a ton load of acting capacity that needs to be tapped. i hope this mail gets to her for her to think well about her future in the film industry. and by the way, it was a very wise move for her to have left NSW and move to LA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi. am ac from the philippines. i like watchin chuck&#8230; good actors&#8230; esp Yvonne Strahovski. i see the potential in her she reminds me of great actors like Meryl Streep, Nicole Kidman, Demi Moore, Cate Blanchett among others. why? because the screen practically loves them. they breathe &amp; give life to characters as if they were real persons, and it brings audiences to get really involved in their fictitous characters because it appeals to real emotions and feelings of real people like u and me. </p>
<p>i believe good actors, like the ones mentioned, and i have particularly noticed with Yvonne Strahovski, although lesser famous than the ones mentioned, not only show a dozen expressions, emotions, feelings of the characters that project authentication, but most importantly, done with the most minimal of physical movement on screen. i know for a fact acting school addresses this, and trains aspiring actors to do just that, but only a handful have mastered the art of less movement with authentic projection of feelings, emotions, and expressions without looking overacting or too subtle.</p>
<p>i see the potential of Yvonne Strahovski, and if she or her people do check on fan mail such as this, she should seriously be careful in doing projects that showcase what she does best acting&#8230; she has a potential for a character actress based on her acting as i&#8217;ve seen. and it&#8217;s no exaggeration. i&#8217;ve watched possibly more than a hundred films of good actors and am very picky. versatility of choosing good roles and good directors are also good for her. i hope she will choose her roles carefully and discern well. to make careful, but planned good decisions to reach a particular goal: to win an Oscar for best female actor.</p>
<p>she is not just another beautiful face as it seems, but has a ton load of acting capacity that needs to be tapped. i hope this mail gets to her for her to think well about her future in the film industry. and by the way, it was a very wise move for her to have left NSW and move to LA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fanboy</title>
		<link>http://chucktv.net/2009/06/21/forbes-sees-potential-for-yvonne-strahovski-plus-more-polls/comment-page-1/#comment-3342</link>
		<dc:creator>Fanboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 01:30:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chucktv.net/?p=1881#comment-3342</guid>
		<description>Theres an Avengers movie in the work that looks lile its gonna be in need of a butt kicking woman... Strahovski would make an amazing Ms. Marvel</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Theres an Avengers movie in the work that looks lile its gonna be in need of a butt kicking woman&#8230; Strahovski would make an amazing Ms. Marvel</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sarahfan</title>
		<link>http://chucktv.net/2009/06/21/forbes-sees-potential-for-yvonne-strahovski-plus-more-polls/comment-page-1/#comment-3279</link>
		<dc:creator>sarahfan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 17:07:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chucktv.net/?p=1881#comment-3279</guid>
		<description>There also is a best line poll. Here is the link:

http://ca.eonline.com/uberblog/watch_with_kristin/b131010_tater_tops_2009_whats_best_line.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There also is a best line poll. Here is the link:</p>
<p><a href="http://ca.eonline.com/uberblog/watch_with_kristin/b131010_tater_tops_2009_whats_best_line.html" rel="nofollow">http://ca.eonline.com/uberblog/watch_with_kristin/b131010_tater_tops_2009_whats_best_line.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gord</title>
		<link>http://chucktv.net/2009/06/21/forbes-sees-potential-for-yvonne-strahovski-plus-more-polls/comment-page-1/#comment-3268</link>
		<dc:creator>Gord</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 02:38:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chucktv.net/?p=1881#comment-3268</guid>
		<description>Regarding the E! Polls.

There seems to be a big push by How I met your mother fans.
I noticed on Fav funny guy today Chuck has dropped over 2% and Neil Patrick Harris has gained those points. 

Also for best comedy Chuck has also slid by about the same amount.
I&#039;m wondering if someone has introduced a script for automatic voting because the rise has been so rapid, when you think about how long it seemed to take to increase a vote by 0.1 %.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding the E! Polls.</p>
<p>There seems to be a big push by How I met your mother fans.<br />
I noticed on Fav funny guy today Chuck has dropped over 2% and Neil Patrick Harris has gained those points. </p>
<p>Also for best comedy Chuck has also slid by about the same amount.<br />
I&#8217;m wondering if someone has introduced a script for automatic voting because the rise has been so rapid, when you think about how long it seemed to take to increase a vote by 0.1 %.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Traci</title>
		<link>http://chucktv.net/2009/06/21/forbes-sees-potential-for-yvonne-strahovski-plus-more-polls/comment-page-1/#comment-3256</link>
		<dc:creator>Traci</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 01:20:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chucktv.net/?p=1881#comment-3256</guid>
		<description>This is the data for Tater Top 2009: Best Chemistry

Which TV couple has the best chemistry?
44.1%  Brennan &amp; Booth, Bones 
28.8%  Chuck &amp; Sarah, Chuck 
11.7%  Chuck &amp; Blair, Gossip Girl 
5.5%  Barney &amp; Robin, How I Met Your Mother 
9.9%  Pam &amp; Jim, The Office 
As you can see Chuck and Sarah are dropping in this pole.  We need all the votes we can get.  That way people can see how much we love the show.  Please vote.  The voting ends on July 7, 2009.
http://www.eonline.com/uberblog/watch_with_kristin/b129983_tater_tops_2009_which_couple_has_best.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the data for Tater Top 2009: Best Chemistry</p>
<p>Which TV couple has the best chemistry?<br />
44.1%  Brennan &amp; Booth, Bones<br />
28.8%  Chuck &amp; Sarah, Chuck<br />
11.7%  Chuck &amp; Blair, Gossip Girl<br />
5.5%  Barney &amp; Robin, How I Met Your Mother<br />
9.9%  Pam &amp; Jim, The Office<br />
As you can see Chuck and Sarah are dropping in this pole.  We need all the votes we can get.  That way people can see how much we love the show.  Please vote.  The voting ends on July 7, 2009.<br />
<a href="http://www.eonline.com/uberblog/watch_with_kristin/b129983_tater_tops_2009_which_couple_has_best.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.eonline.com/uberblog/watch_with_kristin/b129983_tater_tops_2009_which_couple_has_best.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anıl</title>
		<link>http://chucktv.net/2009/06/21/forbes-sees-potential-for-yvonne-strahovski-plus-more-polls/comment-page-1/#comment-3207</link>
		<dc:creator>anıl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 19:12:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chucktv.net/?p=1881#comment-3207</guid>
		<description>oh cmon i wanted to say best***:D no bset</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh cmon i wanted to say best***:D no bset</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anıl</title>
		<link>http://chucktv.net/2009/06/21/forbes-sees-potential-for-yvonne-strahovski-plus-more-polls/comment-page-1/#comment-3206</link>
		<dc:creator>anıl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 19:11:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chucktv.net/?p=1881#comment-3206</guid>
		<description>oh cmon the bset couple is sarah and chuck man...when is chuck back.i heard it will be back on march 2010.is it true.please not say true:(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh cmon the bset couple is sarah and chuck man&#8230;when is chuck back.i heard it will be back on march 2010.is it true.please not say true:(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Traci</title>
		<link>http://chucktv.net/2009/06/21/forbes-sees-potential-for-yvonne-strahovski-plus-more-polls/comment-page-1/#comment-3195</link>
		<dc:creator>Traci</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 20:53:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chucktv.net/?p=1881#comment-3195</guid>
		<description>This is the data for Tater Top 2009: Best Chemistry

Which TV couple has the best chemistry?
44.8%  Brennan &amp; Booth, Bones 
29.4%  Chuck &amp; Sarah, Chuck 
11.3%  Chuck &amp; Blair, Gossip Girl 
5.0%  Barney &amp; Robin, How I Met Your Mother 
9.5%  Pam &amp; Jim, The Office 
Please vote.  We really need the votes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the data for Tater Top 2009: Best Chemistry</p>
<p>Which TV couple has the best chemistry?<br />
44.8%  Brennan &amp; Booth, Bones<br />
29.4%  Chuck &amp; Sarah, Chuck<br />
11.3%  Chuck &amp; Blair, Gossip Girl<br />
5.0%  Barney &amp; Robin, How I Met Your Mother<br />
9.5%  Pam &amp; Jim, The Office<br />
Please vote.  We really need the votes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SarahFan</title>
		<link>http://chucktv.net/2009/06/21/forbes-sees-potential-for-yvonne-strahovski-plus-more-polls/comment-page-1/#comment-3145</link>
		<dc:creator>SarahFan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 03:42:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chucktv.net/?p=1881#comment-3145</guid>
		<description>Current data for Tater Tops 2009: Best Chemistry

Which TV couple has the best chemistry?
41.9% Brennan &amp; Booth, Bones
29.7% Chuck &amp; Sarah, Chuck
12.4% Chuck &amp; Blair, Gossip Girl
5.5% Barney &amp; Robin, How I Met Your Mother
10.5% Pam &amp; Jim, The Office

We&#039;re slowly catching up, but still behind. Please vote if you can.

http://www.eonline.com/uberblog/watch_with_kristin/b129983_tater_tops_2009_which_couple_has_best.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Current data for Tater Tops 2009: Best Chemistry</p>
<p>Which TV couple has the best chemistry?<br />
41.9% Brennan &amp; Booth, Bones<br />
29.7% Chuck &amp; Sarah, Chuck<br />
12.4% Chuck &amp; Blair, Gossip Girl<br />
5.5% Barney &amp; Robin, How I Met Your Mother<br />
10.5% Pam &amp; Jim, The Office</p>
<p>We&#8217;re slowly catching up, but still behind. Please vote if you can.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.eonline.com/uberblog/watch_with_kristin/b129983_tater_tops_2009_which_couple_has_best.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.eonline.com/uberblog/watch_with_kristin/b129983_tater_tops_2009_which_couple_has_best.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SarahFan</title>
		<link>http://chucktv.net/2009/06/21/forbes-sees-potential-for-yvonne-strahovski-plus-more-polls/comment-page-1/#comment-3125</link>
		<dc:creator>SarahFan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 04:15:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chucktv.net/?p=1881#comment-3125</guid>
		<description>Here is what the Tater Tops 2009 Best Couple poll looks like at this moment:

Which TV couple has the best chemistry?
42.0% Brennan &amp; Booth, Bones
28.3% Chuck &amp; Sarah, Chuck
13.0% Chuck &amp; Blair, Gossip Girl
5.8% Barney &amp; Robin, How I Met Your Mother
10.9% Pam &amp; Jim, The Office

Vote if you can at:

http://www.eonline.com/uberblog/watch_with_kristin/b129983_tater_tops_2009_which_couple_has_best.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is what the Tater Tops 2009 Best Couple poll looks like at this moment:</p>
<p>Which TV couple has the best chemistry?<br />
42.0% Brennan &amp; Booth, Bones<br />
28.3% Chuck &amp; Sarah, Chuck<br />
13.0% Chuck &amp; Blair, Gossip Girl<br />
5.8% Barney &amp; Robin, How I Met Your Mother<br />
10.9% Pam &amp; Jim, The Office</p>
<p>Vote if you can at:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.eonline.com/uberblog/watch_with_kristin/b129983_tater_tops_2009_which_couple_has_best.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.eonline.com/uberblog/watch_with_kristin/b129983_tater_tops_2009_which_couple_has_best.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
