<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Chuck Wins Four Golden Taters</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chucktv.net/2009/07/14/chuck-wins-four-golden-taters/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chucktv.net/2009/07/14/chuck-wins-four-golden-taters/</link>
	<description>Chuck news, spoilers, interviews, exclusives</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 01:26:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: kelle</title>
		<link>http://chucktv.net/2009/07/14/chuck-wins-four-golden-taters/comment-page-1/#comment-3689</link>
		<dc:creator>kelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 03:07:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chucktv.net/?p=1929#comment-3689</guid>
		<description>thank SarahFan. i felt the same way about the wording of the voting instructions, but i have noticed that thay changed it and you cant do that anymore. oh well, im looking forward to voting again on the 7th. Go Yvonne!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thank SarahFan. i felt the same way about the wording of the voting instructions, but i have noticed that thay changed it and you cant do that anymore. oh well, im looking forward to voting again on the 7th. Go Yvonne!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SarahFan</title>
		<link>http://chucktv.net/2009/07/14/chuck-wins-four-golden-taters/comment-page-1/#comment-3685</link>
		<dc:creator>SarahFan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 02:37:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chucktv.net/?p=1929#comment-3685</guid>
		<description>@kelle - I don&#039;t think what you did is cheating because on the website, it says something about coming back to vote again. Or at least that how I saw it since this poll is setup for numerous votes from one person. Well, we did win this round for Yvonne. The next one starts on Aug 7 so we&#039;ll have to come back then and vote for her again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@kelle &#8211; I don&#8217;t think what you did is cheating because on the website, it says something about coming back to vote again. Or at least that how I saw it since this poll is setup for numerous votes from one person. Well, we did win this round for Yvonne. The next one starts on Aug 7 so we&#8217;ll have to come back then and vote for her again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: annochino</title>
		<link>http://chucktv.net/2009/07/14/chuck-wins-four-golden-taters/comment-page-1/#comment-3568</link>
		<dc:creator>annochino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 21:23:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chucktv.net/?p=1929#comment-3568</guid>
		<description>u guys are awesome. lotsa fans here in the Phils where am from. my partner &amp; i enjoy watchin ur series quite a lot. good bonding time. when are u guys comin&#039; out in The Ellen DeGeneres Show?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>u guys are awesome. lotsa fans here in the Phils where am from. my partner &amp; i enjoy watchin ur series quite a lot. good bonding time. when are u guys comin&#8217; out in The Ellen DeGeneres Show?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kelle</title>
		<link>http://chucktv.net/2009/07/14/chuck-wins-four-golden-taters/comment-page-1/#comment-3566</link>
		<dc:creator>kelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 18:45:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chucktv.net/?p=1929#comment-3566</guid>
		<description>i have a comment reguarding the blonde vs blonde voting.  dont know if what i did was considered cheating but if you just click on Vote under yonne&#039;s name continually&lt; then all those clicks counted as individual votes. i was able to vote like a thousand times in ten minutes. But now im not able to vote at all. when i click on vote it doesnt change the number of votes. i hope what i did wasnt considered cheating- it was never my intent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i have a comment reguarding the blonde vs blonde voting.  dont know if what i did was considered cheating but if you just click on Vote under yonne&#8217;s name continually&lt; then all those clicks counted as individual votes. i was able to vote like a thousand times in ten minutes. But now im not able to vote at all. when i click on vote it doesnt change the number of votes. i hope what i did wasnt considered cheating- it was never my intent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck Fan</title>
		<link>http://chucktv.net/2009/07/14/chuck-wins-four-golden-taters/comment-page-1/#comment-3539</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck Fan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 20:35:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chucktv.net/?p=1929#comment-3539</guid>
		<description>Thats great. More and more people will notice Chuck with every poll Chuck wins. Chuck foreva!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thats great. More and more people will notice Chuck with every poll Chuck wins. Chuck foreva!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Traci</title>
		<link>http://chucktv.net/2009/07/14/chuck-wins-four-golden-taters/comment-page-1/#comment-3506</link>
		<dc:creator>Traci</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 22:55:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chucktv.net/?p=1929#comment-3506</guid>
		<description>I agree with Gord and Dave about the cheating of the polls.  I really wanted Chuck and Sarah to win for Best Romantic Chemistry.  I voted many times, every day and the numbers didn&#039;t even come close. It would either go up by a point or go down alot.  I notice when I voted for Best Guess Star at least the numbers would move after about 10 times I voted.  Hopeful Chuck and Sarah well been in the running next year for Best Romantic Chemistry and us fans can help them win.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Gord and Dave about the cheating of the polls.  I really wanted Chuck and Sarah to win for Best Romantic Chemistry.  I voted many times, every day and the numbers didn&#8217;t even come close. It would either go up by a point or go down alot.  I notice when I voted for Best Guess Star at least the numbers would move after about 10 times I voted.  Hopeful Chuck and Sarah well been in the running next year for Best Romantic Chemistry and us fans can help them win.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave</title>
		<link>http://chucktv.net/2009/07/14/chuck-wins-four-golden-taters/comment-page-1/#comment-3495</link>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 13:20:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chucktv.net/?p=1929#comment-3495</guid>
		<description>I have no qualms with fighting fire with fire, I just wish the Kristin Bell fans never cheated because I voted for hours manually and it was frustrating that they pulled away easily.  I would have much more enjoyed an old fashion voting showdown.

I also think that the Romantic Chemistry poll was cheated because I voted around the clock for weeks and the Bones fans seemed to pick up all their votes in a short period of time and then never needed to vote again.  Their lead was staggeringly large and remained so to the end.  I cast thousands of votes manually on that poll (and I know some others did too) and we never even came close.  We could not even close the gap that Bones fans seemed to make all in a few days.  Highly suspicious...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have no qualms with fighting fire with fire, I just wish the Kristin Bell fans never cheated because I voted for hours manually and it was frustrating that they pulled away easily.  I would have much more enjoyed an old fashion voting showdown.</p>
<p>I also think that the Romantic Chemistry poll was cheated because I voted around the clock for weeks and the Bones fans seemed to pick up all their votes in a short period of time and then never needed to vote again.  Their lead was staggeringly large and remained so to the end.  I cast thousands of votes manually on that poll (and I know some others did too) and we never even came close.  We could not even close the gap that Bones fans seemed to make all in a few days.  Highly suspicious&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gord</title>
		<link>http://chucktv.net/2009/07/14/chuck-wins-four-golden-taters/comment-page-1/#comment-3486</link>
		<dc:creator>Gord</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 21:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chucktv.net/?p=1929#comment-3486</guid>
		<description>Way to go Chuck fans. 
In my opinion, every time we win one of these polls it will give the show just a little bit more publicity. I really hope there are people out there that will see the results and think - I should check that show out.
After all Chuck is a powerful drug. All it takes is one dose and you are hooked on it for life. 

Yes it was touch and go for a while for favourite funny guy - Barney from HIMYM was in the lead for a while.

I am also disappointed that we didn&#039;t win for best Chemistry, but we did come in second place and had a respectable showing.

Now I think the polls to focus on are Blonde Vs Blonde and Best Crime Solvers at TV.Com.
For the Blonde Vs Blonde poll it looks like the site administrators managed to stop the cheating, but not before Yvonne had an almost 5 million point lead. We probably don&#039;t have to vote much, but should keep an eye on it.

I just hope in the next round there is no cheating from either side. I really want Yvonne to win, but because the fans voted not because a machine voted. Conversely, I don&#039;t want her to lose to a machine either. I know many fans that first day were voting like crazy to counter the cheating from the Kristen fans, but I think in the end some well-intentioned Chuck fan decided to fight fire with fire.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Way to go Chuck fans.<br />
In my opinion, every time we win one of these polls it will give the show just a little bit more publicity. I really hope there are people out there that will see the results and think &#8211; I should check that show out.<br />
After all Chuck is a powerful drug. All it takes is one dose and you are hooked on it for life. </p>
<p>Yes it was touch and go for a while for favourite funny guy &#8211; Barney from HIMYM was in the lead for a while.</p>
<p>I am also disappointed that we didn&#8217;t win for best Chemistry, but we did come in second place and had a respectable showing.</p>
<p>Now I think the polls to focus on are Blonde Vs Blonde and Best Crime Solvers at TV.Com.<br />
For the Blonde Vs Blonde poll it looks like the site administrators managed to stop the cheating, but not before Yvonne had an almost 5 million point lead. We probably don&#8217;t have to vote much, but should keep an eye on it.</p>
<p>I just hope in the next round there is no cheating from either side. I really want Yvonne to win, but because the fans voted not because a machine voted. Conversely, I don&#8217;t want her to lose to a machine either. I know many fans that first day were voting like crazy to counter the cheating from the Kristen fans, but I think in the end some well-intentioned Chuck fan decided to fight fire with fire.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

