<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Chuck Nominated for Emmy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chucktv.net/2009/07/16/chuck-nominated-for-emmy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chucktv.net/2009/07/16/chuck-nominated-for-emmy/</link>
	<description>Your source for news about NBC&#039;s new series, Chuck.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 23:08:13 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: sarahfan</title>
		<link>http://chucktv.net/2009/07/16/chuck-nominated-for-emmy/comment-page-1/#comment-3551</link>
		<dc:creator>sarahfan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 05:42:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chucktv.net/?p=1939#comment-3551</guid>
		<description>@mizenkay - I agree with you on the writing noms. I think vs the Seduction and vs the Ring should have gotten nominated for writing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@mizenkay &#8211; I agree with you on the writing noms. I think vs the Seduction and vs the Ring should have gotten nominated for writing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck Fan</title>
		<link>http://chucktv.net/2009/07/16/chuck-nominated-for-emmy/comment-page-1/#comment-3540</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck Fan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 20:41:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chucktv.net/?p=1939#comment-3540</guid>
		<description>Come on. Chuck deserves more than that. I mean Family Guy (ye I know! wtf right?) got a nomination and not Chuck. Come on. At least we got one. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Come on. Chuck deserves more than that. I mean Family Guy (ye I know! wtf right?) got a nomination and not Chuck. Come on. At least we got one. <img src='http://chucktv.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mizenkay</title>
		<link>http://chucktv.net/2009/07/16/chuck-nominated-for-emmy/comment-page-1/#comment-3535</link>
		<dc:creator>mizenkay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 19:18:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chucktv.net/?p=1939#comment-3535</guid>
		<description>It would&#039;ve been kinda hard for AB to get a nom when apparently he didn&#039;t submit an episode this year. Least that&#039;s what I heard/remember reading someplace.

But I have to agree - the fact that Chuck and/or Zach were slighted really super bugs. Or that there were no writing noms. I thought Entourage was weak this year, and Two and Half Men is just the worst! (but I&#039;m happy for FoTC!!)

Oh well, better luck next year Chuck fans.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would&#8217;ve been kinda hard for AB to get a nom when apparently he didn&#8217;t submit an episode this year. Least that&#8217;s what I heard/remember reading someplace.</p>
<p>But I have to agree &#8211; the fact that Chuck and/or Zach were slighted really super bugs. Or that there were no writing noms. I thought Entourage was weak this year, and Two and Half Men is just the worst! (but I&#8217;m happy for FoTC!!)</p>
<p>Oh well, better luck next year Chuck fans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HollywoodDream</title>
		<link>http://chucktv.net/2009/07/16/chuck-nominated-for-emmy/comment-page-1/#comment-3530</link>
		<dc:creator>HollywoodDream</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 02:01:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chucktv.net/?p=1939#comment-3530</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t believe the show didn&#039;t get a Best Pic and that in the very least Adam Baldwin didn&#039;t get a supporting nom. Very disappointed in what was nominated in a few areas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t believe the show didn&#8217;t get a Best Pic and that in the very least Adam Baldwin didn&#8217;t get a supporting nom. Very disappointed in what was nominated in a few areas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave</title>
		<link>http://chucktv.net/2009/07/16/chuck-nominated-for-emmy/comment-page-1/#comment-3525</link>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 17:50:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chucktv.net/?p=1939#comment-3525</guid>
		<description>These award shows have a time honored tradition of honoring the average/mediocre and blowing off the significant.

Shows like Seinfeld or Everybody Loves Raymond, or any other solid, well rounded show tend to get slighted, IMHO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These award shows have a time honored tradition of honoring the average/mediocre and blowing off the significant.</p>
<p>Shows like Seinfeld or Everybody Loves Raymond, or any other solid, well rounded show tend to get slighted, IMHO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nikky</title>
		<link>http://chucktv.net/2009/07/16/chuck-nominated-for-emmy/comment-page-1/#comment-3523</link>
		<dc:creator>Nikky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 16:23:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chucktv.net/?p=1939#comment-3523</guid>
		<description>The lack of recognition is not a suprise.  However it really lights a new fire under my hind end to do what I can to get this show more attention because the cast and crew deserve recognition.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The lack of recognition is not a suprise.  However it really lights a new fire under my hind end to do what I can to get this show more attention because the cast and crew deserve recognition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew</title>
		<link>http://chucktv.net/2009/07/16/chuck-nominated-for-emmy/comment-page-1/#comment-3522</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 15:14:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chucktv.net/?p=1939#comment-3522</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m disappointed that more of those involved with the creation process didn&#039;t get nominated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m disappointed that more of those involved with the creation process didn&#8217;t get nominated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
