<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: RATINGS: Chuck 3.07 Sees A Drop</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chucktv.net/2010/02/09/ratings-chuck-3-07-sees-a-drop/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chucktv.net/2010/02/09/ratings-chuck-3-07-sees-a-drop/</link>
	<description>Chuck news, spoilers, interviews, exclusives</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 01:26:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Forell</title>
		<link>http://chucktv.net/2010/02/09/ratings-chuck-3-07-sees-a-drop/comment-page-1/#comment-10082</link>
		<dc:creator>Forell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 07:51:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chucktv.net/?p=4219#comment-10082</guid>
		<description>Actually it&#039;s a pentagon and not a triangle or even a square =P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually it&#8217;s a pentagon and not a triangle or even a square =P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lisa</title>
		<link>http://chucktv.net/2010/02/09/ratings-chuck-3-07-sees-a-drop/comment-page-1/#comment-10051</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 06:39:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chucktv.net/?p=4219#comment-10051</guid>
		<description>well guys i just hope to see another season, i really like this show i had never missed an episode!! I really love to see chuck becoming a real spy, for real, but i didn&#039;t feel that the last 2 episodes were strong enough!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well guys i just hope to see another season, i really like this show i had never missed an episode!! I really love to see chuck becoming a real spy, for real, but i didn&#8217;t feel that the last 2 episodes were strong enough!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chuck fans</title>
		<link>http://chucktv.net/2010/02/09/ratings-chuck-3-07-sees-a-drop/comment-page-1/#comment-10044</link>
		<dc:creator>chuck fans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 03:32:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chucktv.net/?p=4219#comment-10044</guid>
		<description>I totally agreed with you : chck Fan#1.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agreed with you : chck Fan#1.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BT</title>
		<link>http://chucktv.net/2010/02/09/ratings-chuck-3-07-sees-a-drop/comment-page-1/#comment-10043</link>
		<dc:creator>BT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 03:26:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chucktv.net/?p=4219#comment-10043</guid>
		<description>Profits from those other markets is certainly taken into account by Warner Bros when it comes to production budgets, etc, and the show isn&#039;t completely dependent on a US network airing it.  However, the US market is by far the largest for them, and without it the show probably wouldn&#039;t be profitable to produce.  The difference the international markets would make is that if NBC canceled it, WB might still consider producing it for another station such as their own network or SyFy.  Those channels might bring in fewer viewers, but they might still provide enough income for the show to stay afloat when combined with international revenue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Profits from those other markets is certainly taken into account by Warner Bros when it comes to production budgets, etc, and the show isn&#8217;t completely dependent on a US network airing it.  However, the US market is by far the largest for them, and without it the show probably wouldn&#8217;t be profitable to produce.  The difference the international markets would make is that if NBC canceled it, WB might still consider producing it for another station such as their own network or SyFy.  Those channels might bring in fewer viewers, but they might still provide enough income for the show to stay afloat when combined with international revenue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck Fan#1</title>
		<link>http://chucktv.net/2010/02/09/ratings-chuck-3-07-sees-a-drop/comment-page-1/#comment-9642</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck Fan#1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 05:57:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chucktv.net/?p=4219#comment-9642</guid>
		<description>I personally believe this season, that the writers have done a great job with spy part of the show, in chuck becoming a real spy.
However Chuck is not a show that is completely about one thing. I would have to say that from everything i&#039;ve read the spy part of the show and romance part of the show are the most important to the majority of fans. Therfore the romance part has to be just as strong, and i don&#039;t believe they have delivered on that so far this season.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I personally believe this season, that the writers have done a great job with spy part of the show, in chuck becoming a real spy.<br />
However Chuck is not a show that is completely about one thing. I would have to say that from everything i&#8217;ve read the spy part of the show and romance part of the show are the most important to the majority of fans. Therfore the romance part has to be just as strong, and i don&#8217;t believe they have delivered on that so far this season.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck Fan#1</title>
		<link>http://chucktv.net/2010/02/09/ratings-chuck-3-07-sees-a-drop/comment-page-1/#comment-9639</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck Fan#1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 05:52:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chucktv.net/?p=4219#comment-9639</guid>
		<description>To DT, i think the number of people who &#039;just look ahead and pick and choose what they want to watch&#039; is very little. I think it&#039;s once they have watched the episode, they decide to not watch the show.

To the people who are boycotting the show so that no one watches, thats pathetic,yes if you feel that watching the next episode is not worth it, than you are entitled to change the channel, but by no means should you try and destroy this show.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To DT, i think the number of people who &#8216;just look ahead and pick and choose what they want to watch&#8217; is very little. I think it&#8217;s once they have watched the episode, they decide to not watch the show.</p>
<p>To the people who are boycotting the show so that no one watches, thats pathetic,yes if you feel that watching the next episode is not worth it, than you are entitled to change the channel, but by no means should you try and destroy this show.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DT</title>
		<link>http://chucktv.net/2010/02/09/ratings-chuck-3-07-sees-a-drop/comment-page-1/#comment-9606</link>
		<dc:creator>DT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 23:52:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chucktv.net/?p=4219#comment-9606</guid>
		<description>your right ill even go a step futher and say that the whole &quot;spoilers&quot; thing that this website promotes really hurts the ratings.No insult on CHUCKTV.NET but siriously people just look ahead and pick and choose what they want to watch and that hurts the demograpfic.In my personal opinion the spoilers are the reason CHUCK has seen such a sicnificant drop in viewers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>your right ill even go a step futher and say that the whole &#8220;spoilers&#8221; thing that this website promotes really hurts the ratings.No insult on CHUCKTV.NET but siriously people just look ahead and pick and choose what they want to watch and that hurts the demograpfic.In my personal opinion the spoilers are the reason CHUCK has seen such a sicnificant drop in viewers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://chucktv.net/2010/02/09/ratings-chuck-3-07-sees-a-drop/comment-page-1/#comment-9602</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 23:41:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chucktv.net/?p=4219#comment-9602</guid>
		<description>I agree with you and i don&#039;t mind either way if chuck stays with hannah or goes with sarah, but unless they have a massive turn around they have just produced an episode which is totally OOC. I understand the double meaning behind &quot;i have a type&quot;, but sarah jumps on the shaw bandwagon immediately and it takes chuck the best part of 20 episodes to get her to show him that much affection!!! Its just not believable at all i can deal with lou because he was new to the spy stuff, jill was the ex he never got over but hannah? Chuck said he loved sarah like 4 episodes ago and this happens. Not believable at all. I will be happy if chuck and sarah are finished (don&#039;t want that but its actually a proper ending) because the way they have set this up i don&#039;t think there is any going back for them now. I love chuck and the relationship stuff is getting on my nerves now. The rest of the ep was awesome and did everyone notice the power rangers reference that was super cool =)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you and i don&#8217;t mind either way if chuck stays with hannah or goes with sarah, but unless they have a massive turn around they have just produced an episode which is totally OOC. I understand the double meaning behind &#8220;i have a type&#8221;, but sarah jumps on the shaw bandwagon immediately and it takes chuck the best part of 20 episodes to get her to show him that much affection!!! Its just not believable at all i can deal with lou because he was new to the spy stuff, jill was the ex he never got over but hannah? Chuck said he loved sarah like 4 episodes ago and this happens. Not believable at all. I will be happy if chuck and sarah are finished (don&#8217;t want that but its actually a proper ending) because the way they have set this up i don&#8217;t think there is any going back for them now. I love chuck and the relationship stuff is getting on my nerves now. The rest of the ep was awesome and did everyone notice the power rangers reference that was super cool =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ggClient</title>
		<link>http://chucktv.net/2010/02/09/ratings-chuck-3-07-sees-a-drop/comment-page-1/#comment-9597</link>
		<dc:creator>ggClient</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 23:27:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chucktv.net/?p=4219#comment-9597</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t get the problem. Sure this episode wasn&#039;t the greatest so far and the season in general was not groundbreaking, but how can you guys just freak out before knowing whats going to happen next. Though I do agree that this episode was not well scripted but somehow it was predictable that C&amp;S were starting to move into different directions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t get the problem. Sure this episode wasn&#8217;t the greatest so far and the season in general was not groundbreaking, but how can you guys just freak out before knowing whats going to happen next. Though I do agree that this episode was not well scripted but somehow it was predictable that C&amp;S were starting to move into different directions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rave</title>
		<link>http://chucktv.net/2010/02/09/ratings-chuck-3-07-sees-a-drop/comment-page-1/#comment-9586</link>
		<dc:creator>Rave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 22:50:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chucktv.net/?p=4219#comment-9586</guid>
		<description>i totally agree with you mike. i for one do not want to see anymore love triangles let alone this love square they got developing. These writers should be fired!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i totally agree with you mike. i for one do not want to see anymore love triangles let alone this love square they got developing. These writers should be fired!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

