action
comedy (jeff, lester and co)
romance (chuck sarah!)
and backstory (i want to more about sarah and casey, they are very interesting and i might find them even more likeable if i got more info)
I agree with what you all said that heartaches are not funny. I am currently recruiting people to watch Chuck and they are happy watching the series but watching chuck and sarah in pain, it makes them sad. I hope the writers will consider some of the positive and good suggestions from their fans (the whole chuck team), because anyway, its the fans that make the chuck season 3 possible, right?…From Philippines. By the way, I pledged to eat one subway sandwich twice a week. lol
]]>Chuck and Sarah have been working together for a couple of years so nothing is going to suddenly happen–it has been developing for a couple of years—If Sarah is still hurting and distrustful because of the break up she is going to have to see the tapes of Bryce Larkin and Roan Montgomery talking to Chuck in the courtyard prior to the break up. Since the courtyard is constantly monitored there should be a tape somewhere. Perhaps Corina will see them and tell her–she loves to get on Sarah about anything that will irritate Sarah. The comedy and adventure of the show could easily carry it except for the heartache of Sarah and Chuck. If their love is a given then the comedy and adventure will not be burdened by personal pain. Pain is not funny —lets have a firm commitment between Sarah and Chuck take place and let the good times roll.
I am getting more than a little concerned that Fedak and Swartz have generated enough negativity that it will impact the viewership in March—they did a good a job of making us care for Chuck and Sarah. I want them together as a loving couple committed for the long term from day one of Season 3.
]]>Moe-Ronic I could not agree with you more. What a shame. It could have been an ecellent show. I almost feel betrayed.
]]>Also, we should remember that Chuck and Sarah are not the only reason we love Chuck (or at least for me). What about the action, what about the comedy, and for God’s sake, what about Jeff and Lester! But seriously, we should not lose sight of the fact that there are other awesome elements of Chuck, even if we maybe get a little dissapointed in the beginning.
A final note: we should have faith in the writers. In my opinion, they have done an outstanding job of keeping Chuck an amazing show all the way through both seasons. Why would they start screwing it up now? I know there is a new plotline coming (Chuck knows kung fu), but why would things be different, at least as far as the quality of the show goes? And we really can’t make any conclusions of of spoilers. We’ve done so much to save this show we love so much. So lets try to have some faith. I sure am going to.
]]>Stupid way to promote a show if you ask me.
I was under the impression Chuck wasn’t a Soap Opera and this defenitely isn’t the crowd that watches Gossip Girl so hey, S&F, how about not treating us like we are.
]]>In addition, I read that article on E! online about the interview with Schwartz. You know, the one that was titled “Chuck and Sarah: 3 Steps Back, 2 Steps Forward”? It’s also on chuckonline.net. I could barely bring myself to read the whole article in the first place. I think one of the writers better warn him to change that ideology before he ends up pis*ing all the fans off and killing the show. If the writers allow the stuff in that article to be put on the TV screen, then they can kiss the show goodbye. You know, it’s funny. At the bottom of the article, the reporter asks about the 2 steps forward and Chris said to trust him in that they love writing about Chuck and Sarah being together. Do they really? If they do, then why the hell do they even want to put MORE stupid love interests between them just to delay and stall the relationship that they really love writing about? Seems they like to torture themselves for some weird reason. What that article should be titled is something like “C&S: 1 small step back, 1 or 2 steps forward”. Of course, to cap all of this off, there’s also the fact that if the stuff in that article gets put on the screen, then it will completely undo the Colonel episode in the eyes of the fans as if F&S had never wanted what happened in that episode to happen, and that would just make things all the worse.
Lastly, I’m afraid that the renewal campaign might have given Schwartz a false sense of confidence and security with the fans. We worked so hard to get the showed renewed that we may have given him the wrong idea in that we will watch the show no matter what we see happening on the screen. If that’s what he thinks, he couldn’t be more wrong. After your fans worked so hard to bring your show back, it’s not the best idea to reward them for their hard work by giving them the one thing they can no longer tolerate, nor stand, nor accept. If they had wanted to do these love triangles in season 3, then they should’ve had Sarah agree to Chuck’s vacation offer as well as telling him what Chuck’s dad prevented her from telling him during their dance so that he would have really broken her heart at the end of it. If that had happened, then I would understand her running to another man. But since it DIDN’T happen and instead the opposite occured, it instead serves as good reason to believe that although she didn’t expect Chuck to re-upload the Intersect, she wouldn’t be so heart broken and mad at him enough to run to another man. In the eyes of the viewers and fans, she should be upset, but only to the point of causing minor relationship issues that her and Chuck could get over by the middle of season 3. So, in the end, Sarah running to someone else would just be all the more absurd and stupid in the eyes of the fans.
]]>