Comments on: Tonight On Chuck: “Chuck vs. the Anniversary”

By: Doctor Bob

Doctor Bob — Fri, 24 Sep 2010 18:08:08 +0000

In reply to Catarina. ...Furthermore, I just went back and watched "the Best Friend" from season 2. There's a flashback scene where an 11 or 12 year old Chuck saves Morgan from being beaten up by a girl, and the caption reads "1992". Yet "the Anniversary" flashback caption is dated 1994 and shows Chuck to be 2-3 years younger!

By: jackvance

jackvance — Fri, 24 Sep 2010 10:47:32 +0000

Chuck is a great story about friendship and 4×01 confirms this ; is it like 007 , action and women , guns and one against the world (the bad ones ) ? NO , it’ s better .It reminds us what it’s important : loyalty to our affections

By: Catarina

Catarina — Fri, 24 Sep 2010 08:06:33 +0000

In reply to Moe. Das Essen jedoch ist nichts besonders :( And they don't air Chuck here anymore...so we all have to wait and buy the DVD's from the UK...

By: Catarina

Catarina — Thu, 23 Sep 2010 14:31:07 +0000

In reply to Doctor Bob. Oh, and I just realized something: it was snowing in Moscow. And it does NOT snow in Moscow in september. Should it be December already (Dr. Bob's theory Nr. 2) and the Halloween episode will be Halloween for us but not on the series? Are they abandoning the real-life calendar correspondence they always kept? I am even more confused.

By: Catarina

Catarina — Thu, 23 Sep 2010 10:23:31 +0000

In reply to Doctor Bob. Oh, Doctor Bob, I am confused again! That's what happens when one (in this case: me) can't watch Chuck when it actually airs... confusion regarding the dates. I think they messed up the dates, just as they did with the "Encino, 1994" thing. They should have said 3/6 months anniversary, then it would make sense (according to theory number one). Sometimes they have this kind of problem like with the "Chuck has never been to therapy"/"it took him several years of therapy to deal with his parents leaving" thing.

By: Larry1234

Larry1234 — Thu, 23 Sep 2010 00:03:45 +0000

In reply to windfarmer. windfarmer could not agree more with you--with the exception of Munn and her boy friend's comments--sorry,a little on the garbage side! Hope she is gone for good.

By: Larry1234

Larry1234 — Wed, 22 Sep 2010 23:59:45 +0000

Relating to the spoilers–I think Chuck’s spoilers are very misleading. It is better for me not to look at any spoiler–unfortunately my lack of discipline keeps me peeking at them. The interview with Munn kind of ruined her appearance on the show—hope she is not in any more episodes. I do not care about her ex boyfriends preferences as they relate to other guys.

By: Larry1234

Larry1234 — Wed, 22 Sep 2010 23:55:21 +0000

In reply to bob. bob says--I think they had so much to accomplish to set up the following episodes that it might have impacted what you wanted to see in episode 1. I enjoyed the episode and one of the highlights for me was Sarah sexting on the plane. I love Sarah doing comedy---no more angst!! I do not like the lies between Sarah and Chuck--hopefully that is at an end and they are together permanently.

By: Doctor Bob

Doctor Bob — Wed, 22 Sep 2010 19:52:12 +0000

In reply to Liz. Iâ€m still confused: I see two possibilities: (1) The three-month mission went from June to September, it's now September, and it's roughly six months since Paris (reason to celebrate) and nine months since Prague (nobody's celebrating that!); (2) The three months begin in September, so it's now December, in which case I missed the Halloween episode. That doesn't work either.

By: Doctor Bob

Doctor Bob — Wed, 22 Sep 2010 16:35:30 +0000

In reply to Catarina. Chuck would have turned 13 in 1994. This kid looked, what, nine? Chuck may have been a late bloomer, but not that late.