Comments on: SPOILERS: Sarah’s Past Is Catching Up With Her (EXCLUSIVE)

By: East Coast Captain

East Coast Captain — Wed, 12 Oct 2011 20:03:17 +0000

I don´t think Chris and Josh would spring a secret child of Sarah´s in Season 5 and the last one to be exact. That would just put a blow into ratings because they´ve had 5 seasons to spring up a child of her´s into the open I know they´ve concocted a lot of dumb storylines like the Shaw one but this would be among them.

By: Tyler

Tyler — Thu, 06 Oct 2011 21:53:42 +0000

In reply to stephen. This comment is bringing back season 3 nightmares for me. The first few sentences couldn't have been more true. It was a lack of attention to Sarah's character that caused the horrible mistake that destroyed season 3. If anyone would like to know what I'm referring to please reply to this comment. Anyway, as far as season 5, I have a strong feeling that this is where that big surprise involving C&S is going to come from. They can't really surprise us to the level that Fedak described with news from any other part of the show. This should be very interesting to watch.

By: Lindsay

Lindsay — Fri, 30 Sep 2011 19:47:48 +0000

In reply to Greek fun. That was just how he found out her real name.

By: uplink2

uplink2 — Fri, 30 Sep 2011 19:07:49 +0000

My feeling is that if the baby is linked to this story with Ryker its that the baby is Sarah’s step sister or brother. Ryker and Sarah’s mom had a baby after she broke up with Jack and when Ryker was Sarah’s handler as a teen. Sarah doesn’t know it yet but that is the unfinished business. Sarah will meet her 10 year old half sister or brother.

By: Greek fun

Greek fun — Fri, 30 Sep 2011 17:57:01 +0000

is there anyone who remember what “graham something” says?
About her birthday certificate? What’s the problem with that and the all story of her childhood and her mother? She didn’t have surname mean real surname or she was having her mothers’ at certificate. I can’t find a logical explanation. Can anyone think something???

By: Lindsay

Lindsay — Fri, 30 Sep 2011 16:26:33 +0000

Maybe Sarah has an older sibling and that would make her the “baby” of the family?

Before this info, I was hoping for a babysitting episode. Oh well, I’m excited to see what’s going to happen in this one!

By: Matt

Matt — Fri, 30 Sep 2011 16:00:14 +0000

Based on Mel’s statement in this article that Sarah’s mom is a very maternal woman, I think the meaning of the episode title is, as several have already speculated above, that Sarah is the “Baby” of the episode and that her mother is very “mothering” to her.

By: potf

potf — Fri, 30 Sep 2011 15:24:10 +0000

What if the baby is the child of Sarah’s handler? Maybe that baby is also in trouble (kidnapped or something like that) and Sarah’s handler asks for her help. I do believe that Sarah’s mom isn’t as innocent as she sounds. In Chuck vs the family Volkoff, Sarah said she was in the middle: maybe her mother was a spy assigned to arrest Burton, which she failed to do because she fell in love with him… Just speculating!!!

By: Rocky Bleu

Rocky Bleu — Fri, 30 Sep 2011 14:49:02 +0000

I don’t know if it would be logical to throw in another ex lover because Chuck and Sarah are married now. Can you imagine what Chuck would do if Ryker showed up and started flirting? I’m sure we’d get a stronger reaction from Chuck than that of which was showed during the Bryce, Cole, and Shaw curves.

By: Rich

Rich — Fri, 30 Sep 2011 13:42:50 +0000

That is a great spec sean. I like the Sarah has to confront her mentor and Sarah’s mom thinking Sarah had a baby. That would be great.