Deprecated: Function wpdb::escape is deprecated since version 3.6.0! Use wpdb::prepare() or esc_sql() instead. in /home4/nicegir6/public_html/chucktv.net/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6078

Deprecated: Function wpdb::escape is deprecated since version 3.6.0! Use wpdb::prepare() or esc_sql() instead. in /home4/nicegir6/public_html/chucktv.net/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6078

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home4/nicegir6/public_html/chucktv.net/wp-includes/functions.php:6078) in /home4/nicegir6/public_html/chucktv.net/wp-includes/feed-rss2-comments.php on line 8
Comments on: SPOILERS: Whose Baby Is That? https://chucktv.net/2011/12/23/spoilers-whose-baby-is-that/ The CHUCK archive Tue, 17 Jun 2014 16:48:26 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.2 By: sarah https://chucktv.net/2011/12/23/spoilers-whose-baby-is-that/comment-page-2/#comment-40557 Fri, 30 Dec 2011 17:31:25 +0000 http://chucktv.net/?p=12331#comment-40557 i think it might me evelyn shaws baby and sarah has been protecting it and now shaw has set things in motion to get his child back

]]>
By: gqdaddy https://chucktv.net/2011/12/23/spoilers-whose-baby-is-that/comment-page-2/#comment-40517 Thu, 29 Dec 2011 19:35:35 +0000 http://chucktv.net/?p=12331#comment-40517 In reply to dont ask.

I hope against hope… the baby isn’t Larkins. Unless that means he’s back, then I’m ok with it – lol.

]]>
By: gqdaddy https://chucktv.net/2011/12/23/spoilers-whose-baby-is-that/comment-page-2/#comment-40516 Thu, 29 Dec 2011 19:34:38 +0000 http://chucktv.net/?p=12331#comment-40516 In reply to Gambs.

Yep… this fits nicely with my theory about Sarah killing all but the baby on a past mission. Friday will tell us a bit more but I think Gambs, you’ve put together the suspected plot for this upcoming episode. If so, nicely done. Got an intersect up there my friend? lol 🙂

]]>
By: gqdaddy https://chucktv.net/2011/12/23/spoilers-whose-baby-is-that/comment-page-2/#comment-40515 Thu, 29 Dec 2011 19:29:00 +0000 http://chucktv.net/?p=12331#comment-40515 In reply to Curtis.

Curtis, don’t hate the show runners. They’ve always managed a pay-off. Sometimes as fans we have painfully endured hardships… “season cough cough 3 cough cough” but we get that pay-off and it makes it all worth while. Often these lead to epic moments in the show’s history and we’re building up to an emotional finale. Wrenches can and will be used along the way.

We’re running high on adrenaline right now knowing we’re close to the end, use that adrenaline my friend to enjoy the final ride… don’t let it use you and rob you of enjoying this to the end.

Just my 2 cents.

]]>
By: dont ask https://chucktv.net/2011/12/23/spoilers-whose-baby-is-that/comment-page-2/#comment-40508 Thu, 29 Dec 2011 16:35:47 +0000 http://chucktv.net/?p=12331#comment-40508 In reply to Tanel.

no you don’t have to watch every episode

]]>
By: dont ask https://chucktv.net/2011/12/23/spoilers-whose-baby-is-that/comment-page-2/#comment-40507 Thu, 29 Dec 2011 16:31:48 +0000 http://chucktv.net/?p=12331#comment-40507 i think the baby’s dad was Bryce Larkin which died and Sarah is hiding but how old is that baby

]]>
By: potf https://chucktv.net/2011/12/23/spoilers-whose-baby-is-that/comment-page-2/#comment-40506 Thu, 29 Dec 2011 16:01:28 +0000 http://chucktv.net/?p=12331#comment-40506 After reading all the comments, I have one question:
why would the CIA want to kill Sarah’s baby (supposing that it is hers)? Mama B had two babies and nobody tried to kill them. If it were hers, she could simply have quited and raised it. And if it were Sarah’s sister, why would the CIA want to kill her sister? And would Sarah really keep on working for an organization that is after her family? The most likely senario is what Gambs and Obleebah said: the baby is from a mission and needs protecting, but Sarah’s mom thinks it’s her granddaughter.That’s why Sarah can’t tell Chuck- she would either have to lie to him or admit to her mother that she had lied to her.

]]>
By: Gambs https://chucktv.net/2011/12/23/spoilers-whose-baby-is-that/comment-page-2/#comment-40505 Thu, 29 Dec 2011 14:27:33 +0000 http://chucktv.net/?p=12331#comment-40505 Come on, gang. Put the clues together. In Santa Suit, Shaw told Sarah that he knew everything about her-all her past missions. He even mentioned “Calgary” and that was how she got a scar on her left arm from trying to catch a throwing star.

So, in the final scene, he says what will keep him warm at nights in solitary confinement was how he set the plan in motion that she could not stop. Then, he asked her, “Do you remember Hungary? Does Chuck know about the baby?”

Hungary was a previous mission. She was sent there by her first handler, Ryker (played by Tim Dekay this week.) Her mission was to kill some important family. The scene you see in the preview where Sarah is firing machine guns with both hands while walking down steps is from that mission. She is supposed to kill the entire family, but she can’t kill the baby.

So, she takes the baby to her mother. She stays for a few days with it, but she has to get back to the CIA, so she tells her mom that she can’t see them anymore. She does it to protect both her mom and the baby. That’s why she always told Chuck that she and her mom were estranged, and I guess that’s why she can’t tell Chuck about it now, because he’ll wonder why she lied all this time to him, after she always told him to trust her.

The plan Shaw put in motion is notifying Ryker the baby is still alive.

But, it’s not Sarah’s child. It belongs to the Hungarian family she was sent to kill.

]]>
By: els https://chucktv.net/2011/12/23/spoilers-whose-baby-is-that/comment-page-2/#comment-40488 Wed, 28 Dec 2011 23:14:13 +0000 http://chucktv.net/?p=12331#comment-40488 the baby cant be sarahs because it looks like only about 1 and a year ago sarah was with chuck also unless it is sarahs mums baby it cant be the sister she mentioned in season 1 because they were 9 on a beach before the baby was borne and it wont be a mission before she met chuck because that was over 5 years ago now and as i said the baby looks no more than 1 years old but theres my views at the moment.

]]>
By: Gambs https://chucktv.net/2011/12/23/spoilers-whose-baby-is-that/comment-page-2/#comment-40480 Wed, 28 Dec 2011 19:20:18 +0000 http://chucktv.net/?p=12331#comment-40480 Here’s the promo.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LsEZHhTHrAw&feature=youtube_gdata_player

]]>