Deprecated: Function wpdb::escape is deprecated since version 3.6.0! Use wpdb::prepare() or esc_sql() instead. in /home4/nicegir6/public_html/chucktv.net/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6078

Deprecated: Function wpdb::escape is deprecated since version 3.6.0! Use wpdb::prepare() or esc_sql() instead. in /home4/nicegir6/public_html/chucktv.net/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6078

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home4/nicegir6/public_html/chucktv.net/wp-includes/functions.php:6078) in /home4/nicegir6/public_html/chucktv.net/wp-includes/feed-rss2-comments.php on line 8
Comments on: Chuck vs. the Podcast 99: One-Two Punch https://chucktv.net/2012/01/02/chuck-vs-the-podcast-99-one-two-punch/ The CHUCK archive Thu, 05 Jan 2012 03:23:05 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.2 By: Mel https://chucktv.net/2012/01/02/chuck-vs-the-podcast-99-one-two-punch/comment-page-1/#comment-40883 Thu, 05 Jan 2012 03:23:05 +0000 http://chucktv.net/?p=12442#comment-40883 In reply to 134sc.

Graham didn’t assign her as Chuck’s handler in that final scene, he said, “I think you’re ready to be a handler.” So she goes, scopes out Chuck and the Intersect, then when the government decides they want to keep Chuck alive, she becomes his handler. Easy peasy.

]]>
By: 134sc https://chucktv.net/2012/01/02/chuck-vs-the-podcast-99-one-two-punch/comment-page-1/#comment-40881 Thu, 05 Jan 2012 02:39:06 +0000 http://chucktv.net/?p=12442#comment-40881 Loved the podcast guys, agree with almost everything. One thing though, Mel I am surprised nobody brought up the problems with that last scene with Graham. Sarah was not assigned as Chuck’s handler until the end of the pilot, and if memory serves Graham had no problem killing Chuck if the situation called for it. That scene for me was a big retcon, and unfortunantly it could have easily been avoided with a change in dialouge. What do you guys think?

]]>
By: IceTear1 https://chucktv.net/2012/01/02/chuck-vs-the-podcast-99-one-two-punch/comment-page-1/#comment-40821 Wed, 04 Jan 2012 11:20:49 +0000 http://chucktv.net/?p=12442#comment-40821 In reply to Sven.

Sarah Walker has made her legal name 1998 when she was recruited, so it´s her name since then. So it´s right that she has that name now.

]]>
By: Mel https://chucktv.net/2012/01/02/chuck-vs-the-podcast-99-one-two-punch/comment-page-1/#comment-40807 Wed, 04 Jan 2012 04:55:04 +0000 http://chucktv.net/?p=12442#comment-40807 In reply to Don Huber.

The mission we saw in “vs the Baby” was between when Bryce & Sarah were partners and when Sarah was assigned to be Chuck’s handler. Bryce had gone rogue already, leaving Sarah without a partner. My speculation is that the CIA then reassigned her to work with a handler to insure that she wasn’t a double agent and to prove her loyalty to the CIA.

]]>
By: Don Huber https://chucktv.net/2012/01/02/chuck-vs-the-podcast-99-one-two-punch/comment-page-1/#comment-40803 Wed, 04 Jan 2012 03:11:54 +0000 http://chucktv.net/?p=12442#comment-40803 I have a question that I hope someone can answer. I would like to hear Mel ideas on my question. How does Bryce Larkin fit in to the back story if after the Chuck vs Baby story Sarah now goes to be Chuck’s handler. As I remember Sarah and Bryce were very close partners for some time length (?). I don’t think it could have been before Sarah and her handler as I would think she had a handler while she was learning the ropes of the CIA business.

]]>
By: jmc https://chucktv.net/2012/01/02/chuck-vs-the-podcast-99-one-two-punch/comment-page-1/#comment-40792 Tue, 03 Jan 2012 22:53:04 +0000 http://chucktv.net/?p=12442#comment-40792 In reply to Sven.

Sarah is Sarah to Chuck, the viewers and she obviously thinks of herself as Sarah as well.

The “Sam” revelation was a horrible misstep, particularly because it wasn’t Chuck she told that to. I think the writers realize it was a bad idea and I don’t think it will ever be brought up again.

]]>
By: Sven https://chucktv.net/2012/01/02/chuck-vs-the-podcast-99-one-two-punch/comment-page-1/#comment-40788 Tue, 03 Jan 2012 22:29:32 +0000 http://chucktv.net/?p=12442#comment-40788 About the Sam thing, I remembered that Sarah felt pretty comfortable when telling Shaw her real name. But why is it that Chuck still calls her Sarah. I mean like he does know her real name (minus surname). Is it that it could bring family of Sarah in danger if her full name gets out? Chuck and Sarah are so close it would just feel right if Chuck knew.

]]>
By: Oliver https://chucktv.net/2012/01/02/chuck-vs-the-podcast-99-one-two-punch/comment-page-1/#comment-40782 Tue, 03 Jan 2012 14:27:27 +0000 http://chucktv.net/?p=12442#comment-40782 Bit confused why sarahs mum didn’t call her sam and cant remember well but possibly one of the boxes shown in papa b’s secret basement has a name that might pop up?

Thoughts?

]]>
By: john https://chucktv.net/2012/01/02/chuck-vs-the-podcast-99-one-two-punch/comment-page-1/#comment-40781 Tue, 03 Jan 2012 13:55:31 +0000 http://chucktv.net/?p=12442#comment-40781 watching chuck season one. it’s so weird watching chuck and sarah be together without actually being together but as “covers”. what’s so great is chuck really wanting sarah but sarah not giving it to him lol.

great podcast again guys. really good stuff!

]]>
By: Alison ( Ali ) https://chucktv.net/2012/01/02/chuck-vs-the-podcast-99-one-two-punch/comment-page-1/#comment-40775 Tue, 03 Jan 2012 07:18:00 +0000 http://chucktv.net/?p=12442#comment-40775 HAPPY NEW YEAR GRAY,MEL AND LIZ I ENJOYED THE PODCAST .

ALISON ( ALI )

FROM

ENGLAND 🙂

]]>