Orbiting Two Suns: Kayla Hart and the Chuck That Almost Was

It is an unassailable fact that, in the “Chuckverse”, no topic generates more impassioned debate than the relationship between Chuck and Sarah. This was recently evidenced by the furious discussion following the “Charah Point-Counterpoint” article which ran on this very site.

The original Team Bartowski, including Kayla
The original Team Bartowski, including Kayla

But many people have forgotten, or maybe never knew, that Sarah was only one of Chuck’s original love interests. There was someone else, someone close by, that Chuck would be secretly pining for from day one. That’s right, geometry haters – the show nearly launched with Chuck embroiled in a love triangle. Who was the vixen who would further complicate the sweet but fragile dawning of affection between our star-crossed lovers?

Her name was Kayla Hart.

Kayla was Chuck’s next door neighbor. Single, twenty-five and heavily into the indie music scene, Kayla worked at the ticket counter of Spaceland, the very same club Chuck took Sarah to in the pilot. The original script for this episode describes Kayla as “…one of the world’s most beautiful f__ups…”, stylish but frugal by necessity.

Kayla was played by Natalie Martinez, a Cuban-American actress and model most recently known for her portrayal of Elizabeth Case in Paul W.S. Anderson’s big budget smash ‘em up, ‘Death Race.’ She brought a raw, visceral sex appeal to that role and judging from the publicity photos for the pilot, she would have evinced a similar quality in her Chuck character.

So what else can we learn from the pilot script? Kayla likes Chuck, in a casually friendly way, but doesn’t really see him as boyfriend material. She’s drawn to musicians, and due to her job she has ample opportunities to hook up with them – and demonstrates it, much to Chuck’s chagrin. She’s a little flighty (“Who knew driving under the influence included pot?”), disorganized (she’s lost her keys) and desirous of opportunities in life that haven’t yet been opened for her (she’d like to travel ‘anywhere James Bond has been’).

Chuck, for his part, is clearly attracted to Kayla. In a telling moment, he watches from the garbage cans as she returns home, oblivious to his attention. His hesitant greeting is too late and too quiet to catch her, and the pitiable performance is witnessed and critiqued by Ellie and Morgan. It’s yet another reminder of how far Chuck’s confidence has fallen after Jill.

Natalie Martinez as Kayla Hart
Natalie Martinez as Kayla Hart

Morgan has his back, however, and after Sarah invites Chuck to show her around Morgan calls Kayla to tell her Chuck’s coming to the club with a date. As he advises Chuck, “nothing turns a girl on like jealousy.” And while Chuck thinks it’s a bad idea, things go surprisingly well – Kayla is impressed by Chuck’s companion and secretly roots for him, while Sarah notices something between Kayla and Chuck that she files away for future reference.

So that’s what was going to happen. But what happens next? How might the first season have unfolded with Kayla in the mix?

First we have to consider what Kayla represents. In some ways, she’s the antithesis of Sarah. Where Sarah is disciplined and precise, Kayla is disorganized and informal. Where Sarah is aloof and defensive, Kayla is open and unguarded. But in one way, Sarah and Kayla are the same: they both symbolize worlds that are alien to Chuck.

While Sarah is a poster child for the cold and ruthless spy world, a study in dispassionate, duplicitous lethality, Kayla represents the gritty, underground music scene – cliquish, mysterious and gangland dangerous. In both of these environments, Chuck is a ‘fish out of water’, ill at ease and conspicuously awkward.

It is around these two disparate stars that Chuck would be hurled in the first season, on a trajectory to orbit first one woman and then the other. Just as viewers might begin to think he was captured irrevocably by one’s gravity, events would conspire to thrust him back towards the other. Too close to Sarah? There’s always Bryce or the “it wouldn’t be professional” rejection. Too close to Kayla? There could be a violent ex-boyfriend or suitor, or a criminal involvement conflict of interest.

A perfect, revolving angst generation machine. Oh, joy.

Want a quick vision of what that might have been like? Just replace ‘Lou/Deli’ with ‘Kayla/Spaceland’ and stir vigorously. With every scene in that arc, you could make a few adjustments for character and location and have a plausible replacement. But instead of two episodes, think thirteen.

How would it have worked out in the end? Hard to say. But I personally believe that the show would be ultimately unsatisfying if Chuck and Sarah’s intertwined journeys didn’t lead them to a more permanent union. And if it were to work out for them, then Kayla – like Lou – would have to become a part of Chuck’s past, like Stanford, Jill and Bryce.

When would that have happened? By the end of the first season, I would hope. One thing seems certain, though. Kayla’s inclusion would have meant reduced time (or even exclusion) of other characters and possibly even the elimination of scenes that are now enshrined in our memories. Going back through these in my mind, I’m having a hard time imagining that it would have been worth it. So for this choice, I have to say to Josh and Chris: Good call.

Hulu Plus Free Trial

About

Check Also

Chuck vs the Goodbye: 10 Years Later

Today marks the tenth anniversary of the Chuck series finale. It feels like a decade …

15 comments

  1. Good call is an understatemant. Her character seems totally NOT awesome. 🙁 Thank god they took her out.

  2. I really enjoyed reading this well done aardvark7734. It would be cool though for them to include the original pilot with Kayla in it on chuckmeout. If for nothing else than give us another episode of Chuck while we wait. New Chuck content has been pretty dry lately.

  3. Of course TPTB would cut out a female character. I hate to keep going back to this, but the misuse of everyone of the fairer sex within the Chuck world is bordering on appalling. So instead of the beautiful Kayla Hart, we, the fans, got stuck with the insufferable Morgan Grimes. Ack! Too bad there are no mulligans in TV.

    • Morgan was there from the beginning, not as a substitute for Kayla. I do wish we’d have some more focus on female characters, though. But then I guess the show would’ve been named Chuck & Friends instead of just Chuck, eh?

    • Hmm, I think Morgan would have been there, regardless. But your point could certainly be made using Lou – I don’t think Rachel Bilson’s character would have appeared, as I mentioned in the article.

      And if you want to focus on underused characters with tremendously fun story arcs, you only need focus on Anna and her untapped potential as a novice NSA agent (re: Casey’s call after seeing Anna defeat Mit in ‘Breakup’).

  4. Thanks for the article.

    I’ve always thought Chuck and Sarah got too close too quickly. Having Kayla in the story may have made it easier to delay the real development of Charah, or a least to have it develop more slowly until the Kayla situation (and Bryce too for that matter) became resolved – perhaps for a season or more.

    We would have had more character development by the time C&S became more serious (if Charah was delayed via Kyla) and therefore more information to understand the inevitable ups and downs of Chuck and Sarah’s relationship.

    On the other hand, Chuck pining for two women who wouldn’t sleep with him would have the potential to make him appear more pathetic than he can be already. Certainly that would have forced the writers to develop Chuck’s character early on such that when he and Sarah actually did get close, we could better understand what Sarah saw in him.

    All in all, I say they should have kept Kyla in.

    PS; for those looking for the pilot script, do a search for Chuck TV scripts – it’s available on the web.

  5. Hi All:

    Good article! I never knew too much about the Kayla character and this article explained her purpose and effect on the show, nicely. It is interesting that the producers and writers were going this route, initially.

    I do agree with niilk that Chuck and Sarah’s relationship started too quickly. However, I don’t think this character would have enhanced the relationship or show. After reading the character’s background in the article, she didn’t really seemed interested in Chuck and tended to go for more “wild” types of men. It appear she was attracted to more free spirited and reckless individuals.

    Also, this type of female I could not picture Chuck being attracted at the time. At that point in his life, he seemed to go for more traditional, conservative types of women. The females he has been attracted to Lou, Jill and even Sarah seemed deep down more old fashion. They are nothing like this young woman.

    Also, I could not see her having much interaction with the other characters on the show. She seemed somewhat designated to the nightclub scene only and would not regualarly interact with Chuck, his family and the Buymore crew. That might be another reason why she was cut.

    I would tend to agree that it was probably a good decision to cut her role in the show. I would not mind seeing her on the show maybe the same character, but a different purpose than what she was originally casted.

  6. Wow. Praise for the showrunners! WooT! This calls for a drink. 😉

    • Heh. I think there’s a little “being tarred by the same brush” going on here, OD. 😉

      I’ve never forgotten that the show has drawn all of its acclaim based on what TPTB have done right, not what they’ve done wrong! In this case, for a number of reasons, I think they absolutely made the right choice.

  7. I think Sarah and Chuck’s relationship has been very slow to develop–too slow__they have been seeing each other every day for how long–11/2 to 2 years. I think Kayla would have just complicated things–However it is hard to tell how the story lines would have developed-She could have been used to accelerate Chuck and Sarah’s relationship.-I am probably the No.1 angst hater because I want Sarah and Chuck to have a loving,long term committed relationship. I think it would be best for the longevity of the show to have that type of relationship and then more time could be spent going after the evildoers as a team and the writers could jack up the comedy and adventure. The BuyMore may be important to the show but I think time devoted to it could be cut by 30% at least. Anna and Ellie offer some interesting possibilities to explore. I have wondered if the “Medium” star Arquette (SP) would have agreed to cut back on her episodes from the 22 contracted to the 13 or so they asked her to do if Medium would not still be on NBC and Chuck would have been cut. Chuck needs to be solidified to guarantee it’s survival.

  8. Great article. I had heard about the character on the Season 1 DVD bonus features (that’s why it’s GOOD to get the DVD, even if you’ve seen every episode). Anyway – ANOTHER beautiful woman on Chuck! Go figure! I can’t say it wouldn’t have been interesting to see how she would have played into the story. If Lou was basically a “place taker” for her in a manner of speaking, what real difference would it have made in the big “CHUCK” picture? If Lou and then Jill were 2 or 3 episode arcs, then Kayla could have been given the same kind of deal.

    Soooo….. in regards to Kayla, I’ll quote one of my favorite lines from the classic Clint Eastwood Movie, The Outlaw Josey Wales. As you know, Josey was planning on “riding alone,” but he winds up picking up Lone Watie (played by the late, great Chief Dan George) and Moonlight (an Indian woman whom Josey rescued from a trading post) along the way. Somewhere along the line a dog enters the picture, much to Josey’s chagrin. So he says to Lone Watie, “Chief, I was just wondering. I suppose that mangy red-bone hound’s got no place else to go, either. He might as well ride along with us. Hell, EVERYBODY ELSE is!”

    So as far as Kayla, why not? Why not have had her “along for the ride.” Everybody else (Lou and Jill were). Could there really have been THAT much difference in the overall scheme of things between HER storyline/episode arc and Lou’s?? I SEEM to remember (although I’m not exactly sure) that Josh or Chris said on the DVD that they decided to eliminate her because basically having her around would make things too complicated (or something to that effect – my memory’s not so good). But didn’t having Lou and then Jill around complicate things?? Seems like six and one-half dozen the other.

    Regardless, please, PLEASE don’t bring her back NOW!! 🙂

  9. Great article Aardie! I have to agree…this was an excellent call on the showrunner’s part. With this additional character, it might have been a very different show we were seeing and I’m not sure it would have drawn so many of us in. I, for one, liked that there wasn’t really a triangle…we knew Chuck was drawn to Sarah and we knew Sarah was drawn to Chuck. They both carried a lot of baggage from the past, and that took the place of any third party (well, most of the time it did). If I had tuned in that first couple of weeks and saw an obvious love triangle brewing, I can’t say for sure that I would have allowed myself to become invested and eventually become as hooked as I was (and am).

  10. I also recall them mentioning this character in the S1 DVD extras. It might have worked for a few episodes, but only if played for comedy. I just can’t imagine that Chuck would have grabbed my attention if there was a serious love triangle going on right in the first few episodes.
    What brought me to the show was the action and the light hearted humour.

    I figured that the writers would eventually bring Chuck and Sarah into a real relationship under the undercover relationship and having Kayla around for the whole season would have made that very awkward.

    I didn’t mind the Lou story line too much, because it was well timed – a fair ways into the season but early enough in the Chuck/Sarah story. The Jill story line might have worked OK in the first season too (maybe right after Nemisis), or even if done right after VS Breakup. I thought overall it advanced the Fulcrum story, and even brought Chuck and Sarah closer together but in my mind was just done at the wrong time.

    I believe that the Kayla story would have definitely been at the wrong time for the series as well, so it was a smart move on the part of Chuck’s creative team to drop that character.

  11. First, interesting piece. She missed out on being part of a great show and great cast, but I think if she has any inkling of the vitriol directed at anyone standing in C/S’ way, she probably thinks she’s better off ;).

    Second, never knew her, never missed her. I’m sure the writers would have found a way to make her funny, but I prefer Chuck/Lou in all honesty. Just recall how charming, confident he was with Lou. I really wasn’t a fan of the whiney, beaten, insecure Chuck in S1. And to see him possibly do that x 2 (with Kayla).

    Third, unless she went through some sort of growth phase too had she been on the show, she doesn’t really make a great match for him IMO. I’m not biased AT ALL (of course not!) but I think that he and Sarah not only are great together, they really do each other good: He softens her (and heartwarms her hehe), and she builds him up by her trust and belief in him. Great duo!

    Last but not least, this could have resulted in a much uglier Charah shipper scene. The Chaylas vs. the Charahs would probably not have stopped without drawing blood!

  12. Short sale in San Diego

    Hey, I think your really on focus with this, I wouldn’t say I totally agree , but its not really that much of a issue.